Diálogo andino

343 papers and 691 indexed citations i.

About

The 343 papers published in Diálogo andino in the last decades have received a total of 691 indexed citations. Papers published in Diálogo andino usually cover Cultural Studies (120 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (78 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (72 papers) specifically the topics of Migration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics (84 papers), Cultural and Social Studies in Latin America (75 papers) and Latin American history and culture (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diálogo andino are Sergio Miranda, Antoni Santisteban Fernández, Óliver Meseguer-Ruiz, Pablo Sarricolea, Hugo Romero Aravena, Alberto Dí­az Araya, Johny Isla, Markus Reindel, Inés Gil‐Jaurena and Iskra Pávez Soto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Diálogo andino

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Diálogo andino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diálogo andino.

Countries where authors publish in Diálogo andino

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diálogo andino. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diálogo andino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diálogo andino more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025