Replace Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery with:
Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and SurgeryUnited States
International Journal of Women’s DermatologyUnited States
Journal of Cosmetic and Laser TherapyUnited States
Cutaneous and Ocular ToxicologyTürkiye
Advances in Wound CareUnited States
Dermatologica SinicaTaiwan
Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium ProceedingsUnited States
Journal of Drugs in DermatologyUnited States
JAAD InternationalUnited States
Dermatology ReportsItaly
Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and SurgeryUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Current problems in dermatology
Current problems in dermatology · 1×
×3.411.1kDERMA
×3.93.5kEPIDE
×1.51.2kIA
×2.82.1kIMMUN
×0.5359PS
Citations per year, relative to Current problems in dermatology
Current problems in dermatology · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Current problems in dermatology
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current problems in dermatology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current problems in dermatology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current problems in dermatology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Current problems in dermatology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current problems in dermatology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current problems in dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.