Current Opinion in Virology

1.2k papers and 46.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Current Opinion in Virology in the last decades have received a total of 46.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Opinion in Virology usually cover Infectious Diseases (471 papers), Epidemiology (413 papers) and Molecular Biology (214 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Virus Research Studies (200 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (176 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (168 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Virology are John W. Schoggins, Charles M. Rice, Lin‐Fa Wang, Arun Srivastava, Florian Krammer, Ralph S. Baric, Mart Krupovìč, Michael Diamond, Eugene V. Koonin and Roger W. Hendrix.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Virology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Virology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Virology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Virology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Virology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Virology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Virology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025