Countries where authors publish in Current Issues in Auditing
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Issues in Auditing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Issues in Auditing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Issues in Auditing more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Current Issues in Auditing
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Issues in Auditing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Issues in Auditing.
About Current Issues in Auditing
The 257 papers published in Current Issues in Auditing in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Issues in Auditing usually cover Accounting (206 papers), Management Information Systems (64 papers), General Decision Sciences (8 papers), Strategy and Management (46 papers) and Information Systems and Management (21 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (197 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (47 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (31 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (29 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (27 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (25 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Issues in Auditing are W. Robert Knechel, David N. Herda, Steven M. Glover, Kean Wu, Jennifer Xu, Manlu Liu, J. Efrim Boritz, Douglas F. Prawitt, Won Gyun No and Dana R. Hermanson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.