Current Herpetology

366 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 366 papers published in Current Herpetology in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Herpetology usually cover Global and Planetary Change (313 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (161 papers) and Genetics (94 papers) specifically the topics of Amphibian and Reptile Biology (309 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (105 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Herpetology are Masafumi Matsui, Hidetoshi Ota, Kanto Nishikawa, Akira Mori, Mitsuru Kuramoto, S. Joshy, Tsutomu Hikida, Masayuki Sumida, Atsushi Kurabayashi and Koshiro Eto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Herpetology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Herpetology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Herpetology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Herpetology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Herpetology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Herpetology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Herpetology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025