Current Cardiology Reports

2.6k papers and 35.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Current Cardiology Reports in the last decades have received a total of 35.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Cardiology Reports usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.8k papers), Surgery (861 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (484 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (459 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (312 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (293 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Cardiology Reports are Mika Kivimäki, Vasken Dilsizian, Roland von Känel, Nathan D. Wong, Jordana B. Cohen, Petra H. Wirtz, Francine K. Welty, Ichiro Kawachi, Eliot L. Siegel and Wenjun Fan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Cardiology Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Cardiology Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Cardiology Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Current Cardiology Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Cardiology Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Cardiology Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Cardiology Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025