Current anesthesiology reports

490 papers and 2.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 490 papers published in Current anesthesiology reports in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Current anesthesiology reports usually cover Surgery (226 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (173 papers) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (156 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (151 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (98 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (82 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current anesthesiology reports are Guy Cammu, Michael P. W. Grocott, Paul E. Wischmeyer, Malcolm West, Guy Ludbrook, Daniel Bolliger, Hari Kalagara, Ki Jinn Chin, James Moore and Michelle Kim.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current anesthesiology reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current anesthesiology reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current anesthesiology reports.

Countries where authors publish in Current anesthesiology reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current anesthesiology reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current anesthesiology reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current anesthesiology reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025