Critical Quarterly

1.1k papers and 4.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Critical Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (227 papers), Sociology and Political Science (141 papers) and Philosophy (51 papers) specifically the topics of Irish and British Studies (60 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (55 papers) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Quarterly are Dick Hebdige, Michael W. Apple, Jonas A. Barish, Paul Gilroy, Simon Frith, Stephen Heath, Colin MacCabe, Terry Eagleton, Andrew Goodwin and Deborah Cameron.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025