Contemporary Social Science

457 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 457 papers published in Contemporary Social Science in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Social Science usually cover Sociology and Political Science (243 papers), Political Science and International Relations (117 papers) and General Health Professions (73 papers) specifically the topics of Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (34 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (32 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Social Science are Vanessa S. Tchamyou, Elizabeth Shove, Wokje Abrahamse, Niamh Murtagh, Birgitta Gatersleben, Stephen Reicher, Ann Buchanan, Glynis M. Breakwell, Fergus Neville and Simplice Asongu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Social Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Social Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Social Science.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Social Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Social Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Social Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Social Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025