Contemporary ob/gyn

200 papers and 382 indexed citations i.

About

The 200 papers published in Contemporary ob/gyn in the last decades have received a total of 382 indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary ob/gyn usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (41 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (34 papers) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (31 papers) specifically the topics of Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (11 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (9 papers) and Pelvic Floor Disorders (9 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary ob/gyn are Allan Covens, Mark P. Trolice, Sandra R. Leiblum, David Schrimmer, Val Catanzarite, Norbert Gleicher, Charles J. Lockwood, Linda Wetzel, Ricardo Azziz and Dace S. Svikis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary ob/gyn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary ob/gyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary ob/gyn.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary ob/gyn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary ob/gyn. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary ob/gyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary ob/gyn more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025