Conservation Genetics Resources

2.1k papers and 20.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Conservation Genetics Resources in the last decades have received a total of 20.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Conservation Genetics Resources usually cover Genetics (1.4k papers), Molecular Biology (1.0k papers) and Ecology (677 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic diversity and population structure (1.3k papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (517 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (473 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Conservation Genetics Resources are Bridgett M. vonHoldt, Dent Earl, Emily E. Puckett, Michael K. Schwartz, Stacey L. Lance, Michael K. Young, Kevin S. McKelvey, Anete Pereira de Souza, Chris L. Chabot and Kevin A. Feldheim.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Conservation Genetics Resources

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Conservation Genetics Resources. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Conservation Genetics Resources.

Countries where authors publish in Conservation Genetics Resources

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Conservation Genetics Resources. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Conservation Genetics Resources with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation Genetics Resources more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025