Countries where authors publish in Colombia Internacional
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Colombia Internacional. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Colombia Internacional with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colombia Internacional more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Colombia Internacional
This network shows the impact of papers published in Colombia Internacional. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Colombia Internacional.
About Colombia Internacional
The 569 papers published in Colombia Internacional in the last decades have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Colombia Internacional usually cover Political Science and International Relations (359 papers), Development (48 papers) and Demography (128 papers) specifically the topics of International Relations in Latin America (145 papers), Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia (118 papers), History and Politics in Latin America (116 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (98 papers), Public Policy and Governance (59 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (52 papers), Political Dynamics in Latin America (45 papers) and International Development and Aid (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Colombia Internacional are Arlene B. Tickner, Angelika Rettberg, Virginie Laurent, Richard Snyder, Kristina Dietz, Luis Eduardo Guarnizo, Lúcio Rennó, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Luciana Tatagiba and Ralf J. Leiteritz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.