Countries where authors publish in Biomedical Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomedical Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomedical Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomedical Reports more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomedical Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomedical Reports.
About Biomedical Reports
The 2.0k papers published in Biomedical Reports in the last decades have received a total of 26.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Biomedical Reports usually cover Cancer Research (88 papers), Hepatology (46 papers), Nephrology (42 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (31 papers) and Rheumatology (54 papers) specifically the topics of MicroRNA in disease regulation (48 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (32 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (17 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (16 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (15 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (14 papers) and Oral microbiology and periodontitis research (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomedical Reports are Xia Zhang, Weiwei Chen, Wenjuan Huang, Yin‐Hsun Feng, Chao‐Jung Tsao, Nyet Kui Wong, Sunil Mathur, Joseph A. Sutton, Yuyin Xu and Jing Zhou.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.