Colonial Latin American Review

506 papers and 1.7k indexed citations

About

The 506 papers published in Colonial Latin American Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Colonial Latin American Review usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (276 papers), Anthropology (158 papers) and Demography (158 papers) specifically the topics of Latin American history and culture (276 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (147 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Colonial Latin American Review are Alex Borucki, Carolyn Dean, Elizabeth Anne Kuznesof, Stuart B. Schwartz, Camilla Townsend, Asunción Lavrín, Catherine Julien, Karen B. Graubart, David Tavárez and Kris Lane.

In The Last Decade

Colonial Latin American Review

327 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Colonial Latin American Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Colonial Latin American Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Colonial Latin American Review.

Countries where authors publish in Colonial Latin American Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Colonial Latin American Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Colonial Latin American Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colonial Latin American Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026