Computers in Physics
About
In The Last Decade
Computers in Physics
474 papers receiving 37.1k citations
Fields of papers published in Computers in Physics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Computers in Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computers in Physics.
Countries where authors publish in Computers in Physics
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computers in Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computers in Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computers in Physics more than expected).
- Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (1993)
- Savitzky-Golay Smoothing Filters (1990)
- Ten Lectures on Wavelets (1992)
- Understanding Molecular Simulation (1997)
- A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques (1998)
- Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering (1994)
- Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos (1990)
- An Introduction to Wavelets (1992)
- IMD—Software for modeling the optical properties of multilayer films (1998)
- Introduction to the Bethe Ansatz I (1997)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.