Countries where authors publish in Chronique d Egypte
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chronique d Egypte. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chronique d Egypte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chronique d Egypte more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Chronique d Egypte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chronique d Egypte.
About Chronique d Egypte
The 616 papers published in Chronique d Egypte in the last decades have received a total of 729 indexed citations . Papers published in Chronique d Egypte usually cover Archeology (421 papers), Anthropology (202 papers), Classics (32 papers), Religious studies (41 papers) and Language and Linguistics (37 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (252 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (222 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (179 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (155 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (128 papers), Ancient Near East History (77 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (44 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chronique d Egypte are Willy Clarysse, Jean Bingen, Claire Préaux, Roger S. Bagnall, Naphtali Lewis, Raymond Bogaert, Hans Goedicke, E. G. Turner, J. David Thomas and Herbert C. Youtie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.