Countries where authors publish in Chinese Herbal Medicines
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Herbal Medicines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Herbal Medicines more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines
This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines.
About Chinese Herbal Medicines
The 798 papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines in the last decades have received a total of 7.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Chinese Herbal Medicines usually cover Complementary and alternative medicine (165 papers), Pharmacology (156 papers), Pharmacology (111 papers), Biochemistry (40 papers) and Analytical Chemistry (50 papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (136 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (107 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (90 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (74 papers), Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (68 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (45 papers), Plant-based Medicinal Research (40 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Herbal Medicines are Changxiao Liu, Pei‐Gen Xiao, Da‐Cheng Hao, Chun Hu, De‐an Guo, Changxiao Liu, Shilin Chen, Xiaojie Gu, Xiaojiaoyang Li and Jianping Han.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.