International Journal of Computers and Applications · 1×
×1.01k/2kCNC
×1.21k/1kIS
×0.91k/2kAI
×0.7617/941CVPR
×0.9376/440SP
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Countries where authors publish in Chinese Journal of Computers
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Journal of Computers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Journal of Computers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Journal of Computers more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Chinese Journal of Computers
This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Journal of Computers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Journal of Computers.
About Chinese Journal of Computers
The 893 papers published in Chinese Journal of Computers in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Chinese Journal of Computers usually cover Computer Networks and Communications (355 papers), Hardware and Architecture (92 papers) and Software (49 papers) specifically the topics of Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (70 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (53 papers) and Caching and Content Delivery (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Journal of Computers are Guoyin Wang, Yiyu Yao, Zheng Huo, Binxing Fang, Fang Hou, Jian Yin, Yuanzhuo Wang, Hong Yu, Xueqi Cheng and Changjun Jiang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.