Chinese Geographical Science

1.9k papers and 24.8k indexed citations

About

The 1.9k papers published in Chinese Geographical Science in the last decades have received a total of 24.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Geographical Science usually cover Global and Planetary Change (733 papers), Atmospheric Science (426 papers) and Ecology (369 papers) specifically the topics of Land Use and Ecosystem Services (425 papers), Remote Sensing and Land Use (207 papers) and Environmental Changes in China (179 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Geographical Science are Bojie Fu, Pingyu Zhang, Chuanglin Fang, Chaolin Gu, Wenhui Kuang, Yansui Liu, Yaning Chen, Yun Hou, Guoping Li and Zhiyun Ouyang.

In The Last Decade

Chinese Geographical Science

1.8k papers receiving 23.7k citations

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Geographical Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Geographical Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Geographical Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Geographical Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Chinese Geographical Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Geographical Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Geographical Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026