Clinical Endoscopy

2.0k papers and 15.1k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Clinical Endoscopy in the last decades have received a total of 15.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Endoscopy usually cover Surgery (1.4k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.0k papers) and Gastroenterology (580 papers) specifically the topics of Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (541 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (391 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (391 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Endoscopy are Ron R. Allison, K. Moghissi, Michel Kahaleh, Tsuneo Oyama, Gwang Ha Kim, Il Yoon, Young Key Shim, Hyun Ho Choi, Jiazhu Li and Jae Young Jang.

In The Last Decade

Clinical Endoscopy

1.7k papers receiving 13.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Clinical Endoscopy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Endoscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Endoscopy.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Endoscopy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Endoscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Endoscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Endoscopy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026