Chinese Clinical Oncology

793 papers and 6.3k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 793 papers published in Chinese Clinical Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Clinical Oncology usually cover Oncology (333 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (251 papers) and Surgery (179 papers) specifically the topics of Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (69 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (69 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Clinical Oncology are Geoffrey Y. Ku, Yun Shin Chun, Andrew Lee, Tomoharu Sugie, Lewis R. Roberts, Lorena Marcano-Bonilla, Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa, Peter J. Allen, Luke Russell and Kah-Whye Peng.

In The Last Decade

Chinese Clinical Oncology

685 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Chinese Clinical Oncology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Clinical Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Clinical Oncology.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Clinical Oncology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Clinical Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Clinical Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Clinical Oncology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026