This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cartilage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cartilage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cartilage more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cartilage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cartilage.
About Cartilage
The 1.1k papers published in Cartilage in the last decades have received a total of 17.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Cartilage usually cover Rheumatology (842 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (179 papers), Urology (129 papers), Surgery (623 papers) and Equine (17 papers) specifically the topics of Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (817 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (460 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (306 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (183 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (129 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (115 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (63 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cartilage are Giuseppe Filardo, John G. Kennedy, Christopher D. Murawski, Alberto Gobbi, Andreas H. Gomoll, Brian J. Cole, Stefano Zaffagnini, Kai Mithoefer, Casper Bindzus Foldager and Christian Candrian.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.