Botanical studies

812 papers and 12.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 812 papers published in Botanical studies in the last decades have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Botanical studies usually cover Plant Science (487 papers), Molecular Biology (361 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (261 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (136 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (124 papers) and Plant and animal studies (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Botanical studies are Katrin Viehweger, Michael F. Fay, Edward C. Yeung, Ching‐I Peng, Tian-Ming Yen, Pooja Parmar, Nilima Kumari, Vinay Sharma, Kuo‐Fang Chung and Paulo J.C. Favas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Botanical studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Botanical studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Botanical studies.

Countries where authors publish in Botanical studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Botanical studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Botanical studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Botanical studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025