Systematics and Biodiversity

807 papers and 12.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 807 papers published in Systematics and Biodiversity in the last decades have received a total of 12.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Systematics and Biodiversity usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (347 papers), Ecology (264 papers) and Molecular Biology (188 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (136 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (111 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Systematics and Biodiversity are Andrew V. Z. Brower, Christoph Bleidorn, Fernando Gómez, Salvador Carranza, E. N. Arnold, Jesús Rodrigo‐Comino, Olivier Rieppel, Cene Fišer, Peter Trontelj and Denis H. Lynn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Systematics and Biodiversity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Systematics and Biodiversity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Systematics and Biodiversity.

Countries where authors publish in Systematics and Biodiversity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Systematics and Biodiversity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Systematics and Biodiversity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Systematics and Biodiversity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025