Bioresource Technology Reports

2.0k papers and 26.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Bioresource Technology Reports in the last decades have received a total of 26.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Bioresource Technology Reports usually cover Biomedical Engineering (867 papers), Molecular Biology (381 papers) and Pollution (337 papers) specifically the topics of Biofuel production and bioconversion (441 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (253 papers) and Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production (245 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bioresource Technology Reports are Indu Shekhar Thakur, Zhongfang Lei, P. Balasubramanian, Prakram Singh Chauhan, Virendra Kumar Vijay, Rangabhashiyam Selvasembian, N. L. Panwar, Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Barquilha, Ashish N. Sawarkar and Ashok Pandey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Bioresource Technology Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bioresource Technology Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bioresource Technology Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Bioresource Technology Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bioresource Technology Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bioresource Technology Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bioresource Technology Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025