Bioelectrochemistry

2.9k papers and 72.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Bioelectrochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 72.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Bioelectrochemistry usually cover Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.3k papers), Molecular Biology (1.2k papers) and Electrochemistry (828 papers) specifically the topics of Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (1.1k papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (828 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (683 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bioelectrochemistry are Damijan Miklavčič, Lluis M. Mir, Ana Maria Oliveira‐Brett, Maria Bryszewska, Dake Xu, Tingyue Gu, Barbara Klajnert‐Maculewicz, Hermann Berg, Tina Batista Napotnik and Takeo Ohsaka.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Bioelectrochemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bioelectrochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bioelectrochemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Bioelectrochemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bioelectrochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bioelectrochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bioelectrochemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025