Biblische Zeitschrift

549 papers and 623 indexed citations

About

The 549 papers published in Biblische Zeitschrift in the last decades have received a total of 623 indexed citations. Papers published in Biblische Zeitschrift usually cover Religious studies (337 papers), Archeology (142 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (122 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (299 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (109 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biblische Zeitschrift are Rudolf Schnackenburg, Craig A. Evans, Stefan Schreiber, Kurt Schubert, Nadav Na’aman, Christoph Burchard, Walter Ameling, Hans‐Josef Klauck, J. Albert Harrill and Wolfgang Richter.

In The Last Decade

Biblische Zeitschrift

206 papers receiving 307 citations

Countries where authors publish in Biblische Zeitschrift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biblische Zeitschrift. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biblische Zeitschrift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biblische Zeitschrift more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Biblische Zeitschrift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biblische Zeitschrift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biblische Zeitschrift.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026