Behavioral Sciences

3.5k papers and 22.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in Behavioral Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 22.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Behavioral Sciences usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.1k papers), Social Psychology (1.0k papers) and Sociology and Political Science (724 papers) specifically the topics of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (254 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (237 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (207 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Behavioral Sciences are Shervin Assari, Rita Berto, Jack Drescher, Jack L. Nasar, Carol S. North, Angela de Bruin, Rikinkumar S. Patel, Maryam Moghani Lankarani, Heather C. Lench and Shane W. Bench.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Behavioral Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Behavioral Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Behavioral Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Behavioral Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Behavioral Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Behavioral Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavioral Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025