Australian Zoologist

882 papers and 6.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 882 papers published in Australian Zoologist in the last decades have received a total of 6.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian Zoologist usually cover Ecology (580 papers), Global and Planetary Change (237 papers) and Ecological Modeling (222 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (411 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (222 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (157 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Zoologist are Graham H. Pyke, Harry F. Recher, Arthur White, Ross L. Goldingay, Ian Abbott, Daniel Lunney, William A. Buttemer, A. Clinton White, Michael Archer and John K. Ling.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian Zoologist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Zoologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Zoologist.

Countries where authors publish in Australian Zoologist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Zoologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Zoologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Zoologist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025