Countries where authors publish in Atmospheric Environment X
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Atmospheric Environment X. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Atmospheric Environment X with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Atmospheric Environment X more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Atmospheric Environment X
This network shows the impact of papers published in Atmospheric Environment X. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Atmospheric Environment X.
About Atmospheric Environment X
The 310 papers published in Atmospheric Environment X in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Atmospheric Environment X usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (185 papers), Atmospheric Science (164 papers) and Automotive Engineering (88 papers) specifically the topics of Air Quality and Health Impacts (179 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (160 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (88 papers), Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (68 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (50 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (25 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (21 papers) and Wind and Air Flow Studies (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Atmospheric Environment X are Fabio Murena, Domenico Toscano, Farzan Oroumiyeh, Sarath Guttikunda, Yifang Zhu, David C. Carslaw, Celia Faiola, Ditte Taipale, Albert A. Presto and Allen L. Robinson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.