AIMS environmental science

387 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 387 papers published in AIMS environmental science in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in AIMS environmental science usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (102 papers), Global and Planetary Change (76 papers) and Pollution (74 papers) specifically the topics of Air Quality and Health Impacts (35 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (29 papers) and Heavy metals in environment (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in AIMS environmental science are Phoebe A. Stapleton, Peter Newman, Michael R. Templeton, Quazi K. Hassan, Khaled Hazaymeh, Mary J. Thornbush, Hsunling Bai, Tsung‐Yu Lee, Biswajit Sarkar and Santanu Kumar Ghosh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in AIMS environmental science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in AIMS environmental science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in AIMS environmental science.

Countries where authors publish in AIMS environmental science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in AIMS environmental science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in AIMS environmental science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AIMS environmental science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025