Assistive Technology

849 papers and 11.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 849 papers published in Assistive Technology in the last decades have received a total of 11.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Assistive Technology usually cover Occupational Therapy (411 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (213 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (161 papers) specifically the topics of Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (381 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (187 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Assistive Technology are Hongxin Zhao, Molly Follette Story, Janice Light, Rhoda Weiss‐Lambrou, Louise Demers, Bernadette Ska, James A. Lenker, Victor Paquet, Frank DeRuyter and David McNaughton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Assistive Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Assistive Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Assistive Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Assistive Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Assistive Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Assistive Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assistive Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025