Asian Music
- Music top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Anthropology top 10%
- Topics
- Diverse Musicological StudiesMusic History and CultureMusicology and Musical Analysis
In The Last Decade
Asian Music
410 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Music 1.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.0k
- Cultural Studies 496
- Political Science and International Relations 384
- Anthropology 292
Countries where authors publish in Asian Music
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Music. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Music with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Music more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Asian Music
This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Music. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Music.
About Asian Music
The 593 papers published in Asian Music in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Asian Music usually cover Music (243 papers), Cultural Studies (131 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (36 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Musicological Studies (127 papers), Music History and Culture (105 papers) and Musicology and Musical Analysis (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Music are Lois Ibsen al Faruqi, Peter Manuel, Bruno Nettl, Martin Clayton, Anthony Fung, Stephen Blum, Judith Becker, Terry E. Miller, Andrew F. Jones and Craig A. Lockard.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.