Post-Communist Economies

844 papers and 7.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 844 papers published in Post-Communist Economies in the last decades have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Post-Communist Economies usually cover Economics and Econometrics (417 papers), Political Science and International Relations (258 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (258 papers) specifically the topics of Global trade and economics (142 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (141 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Post-Communist Economies are Anastassia Obydenkova, Igor Gurkov, Mariusz Próchniak, Andrea Szalavetz, Rüdiger Ahrend, Benno Torgler, Laure Latruffe, Štefan Bojnec, Imre Fertő and Canfei He.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Post-Communist Economies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Post-Communist Economies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Post-Communist Economies.

Countries where authors publish in Post-Communist Economies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Post-Communist Economies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Post-Communist Economies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Post-Communist Economies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025