Archives of Biological Sciences

1.8k papers and 11.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Archives of Biological Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Archives of Biological Sciences usually cover Plant Science (566 papers), Molecular Biology (418 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (352 papers) specifically the topics of Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (117 papers), Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy (92 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archives of Biological Sciences are Marko Sabovljević, B.P.M. Ćurčić, Petar D. Marin, Srećko Ćurčić, Marina Sokóvić, Jelena Knežević‐Vukčević, Biljana Bojović, Slobodan E. Makarov, Slaviša Stanković and Nina Ćurčić.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archives of Biological Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archives of Biological Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archives of Biological Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Archives of Biological Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archives of Biological Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archives of Biological Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archives of Biological Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025