Countries where authors publish in Acta Pharmacologica Sinica
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Pharmacologica Sinica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Pharmacologica Sinica more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Acta Pharmacologica Sinica
This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Pharmacologica Sinica.
About Acta Pharmacologica Sinica
The 4.3k papers published in Acta Pharmacologica Sinica in the last decades have received a total of 144.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Acta Pharmacologica Sinica usually cover Pharmacology (134 papers), Molecular Biology (713 papers), Neurology (70 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (74 papers) and Pharmacology (118 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (83 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (68 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (63 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (60 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (56 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (55 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (52 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Pharmacologica Sinica are H. Eric Xu, Kwang-Tae Choi, Karsten Melcher, Zheng‐Hong Qin, Zheng-Hong Qin, Shuwen Liu, Yan Wang, Wei Xü, Chan Yang and Yuan Huang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.