Applied Spectroscopy Reviews

899 papers and 36.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 899 papers published in Applied Spectroscopy Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 36.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Spectroscopy Reviews usually cover Analytical Chemistry (360 papers), Spectroscopy (240 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (186 papers) specifically the topics of Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (184 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (167 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (163 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Spectroscopy Reviews are Ihtesham Ur Rehman, Shazza Rehman, Zanyar Movasaghi, Paul A. Wilks, Tomas Hirschfeld, Satoru Tsuchikawa, Jerome Workman, Dieter Naumann, David J. Butcher and Masamichi Tsuboi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Spectroscopy Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Spectroscopy Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Spectroscopy Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Spectroscopy Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Spectroscopy Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Spectroscopy Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Spectroscopy Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025