Applied Financial Economics

2.2k papers and 35.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Applied Financial Economics in the last decades have received a total of 35.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Financial Economics usually cover Finance (1.7k papers), Economics and Econometrics (1.4k papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (843 papers) specifically the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (856 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (820 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (735 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Financial Economics are Thomas Lux, Ling Hu, Mark P. Taylor, Angelos Kanas, José Manuel Pastor Monsálvez, Jo Danbolt, Taufiq Choudhry, Victor Murinde, Robert W. Faff and Leigh Drake.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Financial Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Financial Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Financial Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Financial Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Financial Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Financial Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Financial Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025