Annalen der Physik

5.0k papers and 52.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.0k papers published in Annalen der Physik in the last decades have received a total of 52.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Annalen der Physik usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.7k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (814 papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (810 papers) specifically the topics of Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (502 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (458 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (402 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annalen der Physik are Carlos F.M. Coimbra, Franz Wegner, J. W. Maluf, Volker Eyert, Hans Wolter, Pierre Meystre, Albert Einstein, W. Ebeling, G. Kelbg and Jan von Delft.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annalen der Physik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annalen der Physik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annalen der Physik.

Countries where authors publish in Annalen der Physik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annalen der Physik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annalen der Physik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annalen der Physik more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025