Chinese Journal of Physics

4.0k papers and 39.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.0k papers published in Chinese Journal of Physics in the last decades have received a total of 39.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Journal of Physics usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.0k papers), Materials Chemistry (792 papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (758 papers) specifically the topics of Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer (388 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (363 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (302 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Journal of Physics are Ioan Pop, M. Sharif, Tasawar Hayat, Anuar Ishak, Aly R. Seadawy, Dumitru Băleanu, Roslinda Nazar, Ali J. Chamkha, Saeed Dinarvand and Ahmed Alsaedi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chinese Journal of Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Journal of Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Journal of Physics.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Journal of Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Journal of Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Journal of Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Journal of Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025