Animal Biotelemetry

367 papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 367 papers published in Animal Biotelemetry in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Animal Biotelemetry usually cover Ecology (248 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (204 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (111 papers) specifically the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (158 papers), Marine animal studies overview (143 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Animal Biotelemetry are A. Peter Klimley, John G. Kie, Eva B. Thorstad, Rory P. Wilson, Martin Wikelski, Danielle Brown, Roland Kays, Martyn C. Lucas, Nicole Nasby-Lucas and Michael L. Domeier.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Animal Biotelemetry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Animal Biotelemetry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Animal Biotelemetry.

Countries where authors publish in Animal Biotelemetry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Animal Biotelemetry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Animal Biotelemetry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Animal Biotelemetry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025