The Anatomical Record

7.2k papers and 212.4k indexed citations

About

The 7.2k papers published in The Anatomical Record in the last decades have received a total of 212.4k indexed citations. Papers published in The Anatomical Record usually cover Molecular Biology (2.3k papers), Surgery (1.1k papers) and Cell Biology (872 papers) specifically the topics of Reproductive Biology and Fertility (364 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (362 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (309 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Anatomical Record are Harold M. Frost, John H. Luft, C. P. Leblond, Richard W. Young, H.J.G. Gundersen, Lutz Slomianka, Mark J. West, Claire Huckins, F. N. Low and Y. Clermont.

In The Last Decade

The Anatomical Record

7.0k papers receiving 197.8k citations

Fields of papers published in The Anatomical Record

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Anatomical Record. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Anatomical Record.

Countries where authors publish in The Anatomical Record

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Anatomical Record. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Anatomical Record with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Anatomical Record more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026