The AMA Journal of Ethic

2.4k papers and 12.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in The AMA Journal of Ethic in the last decades have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations. Papers published in The AMA Journal of Ethic usually cover General Health Professions (934 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (782 papers) and Clinical Psychology (287 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in medical practice (349 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (190 papers) and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Medical Decision-Making (181 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The AMA Journal of Ethic are Andrew Jameton, Michael J. Rigby, Shivan J. Mehta, Carina Fourie, C. Donald Combs, Peter Szolovits, Irene Y. Chen, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Christina Nicolaidis and Cheryl R. Herman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The AMA Journal of Ethic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The AMA Journal of Ethic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The AMA Journal of Ethic.

Countries where authors publish in The AMA Journal of Ethic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The AMA Journal of Ethic. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The AMA Journal of Ethic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The AMA Journal of Ethic more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025