Alpine Botany

232 papers and 4.0k indexed citations

About

The 232 papers published in Alpine Botany in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Alpine Botany usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (129 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (125 papers) and Plant Science (125 papers) specifically the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (122 papers), Plant and animal studies (79 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Alpine Botany are Christian Körner, Jens Paulsen, Eva Spehn, Sergey Rosbakh, Jürg Stöcklin, Christine Römermann, Peter Poschlod, Katrin Rudmann-Maurer, Davnah Payne and Walter Jetz.

In The Last Decade

Alpine Botany

222 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Countries where authors publish in Alpine Botany

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Alpine Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Alpine Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alpine Botany more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Alpine Botany

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Alpine Botany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Alpine Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026