AIMS Biophysics

231 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 231 papers published in AIMS Biophysics in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in AIMS Biophysics usually cover Molecular Biology (101 papers), Biomedical Engineering (31 papers) and Plant Science (23 papers) specifically the topics of Protein Structure and Dynamics (16 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (16 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in AIMS Biophysics are Michael R. Hamblin, James C. L. Chow, Missag H. Parseghian, Richard C. Petersen, J. Bernard Heymann, Mary J. Beilby, Daniel L. Baker, Abby L. Parrill, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin and Gydo C. P. van Zundert.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in AIMS Biophysics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in AIMS Biophysics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in AIMS Biophysics.

Countries where authors publish in AIMS Biophysics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in AIMS Biophysics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in AIMS Biophysics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AIMS Biophysics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025