Agricultural History

1.0k papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Agricultural History in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Agricultural History usually cover Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (205 papers), Sociology and Political Science (186 papers) and Anthropology (118 papers) specifically the topics of American Environmental and Regional History (187 papers), American History and Culture (113 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Agricultural History are Mark S. Coyne, Peter Boomgaard, David Vaught, Douglas Helms, Stephen J. Russell, Terry Rugeley, Hal S. Barron, Barry J. Barnett, John D. O’Sullivan and Mark Spence.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Agricultural History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Agricultural History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Agricultural History.

Countries where authors publish in Agricultural History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Agricultural History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Agricultural History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agricultural History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025