Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology

982 papers and 10.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 982 papers published in Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology in the last decades have received a total of 10.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology usually cover Neurology (205 papers), Surgery (204 papers) and Otorhinolaryngology (187 papers) specifically the topics of Vestibular and auditory disorders (198 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (116 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (112 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology are E. Vitte, G Freyss, A. Sémont, Philipos C. Loizou, Ann E. Geers, Stefan Stenfelt, Jessica Hawkins, Wolfgang Steiner, H. F. Schuknecht and Rudolf Probst.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

Countries where authors publish in Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025