Advances in High Energy Physics

1.3k papers and 13.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Advances in High Energy Physics in the last decades have received a total of 13.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Advances in High Energy Physics usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.1k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (550 papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (376 papers) specifically the topics of Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (529 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (505 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (501 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in High Energy Physics are John McGreevy, Kirill Tuchin, Florian Staub, M. Hortaçsu, Gary Steigman, Ralf Rapp, H. Hassanabadi, Faizuddin Ahmed, G. G. L. Nashed and F. H. Liu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Advances in High Energy Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in High Energy Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in High Energy Physics.

Countries where authors publish in Advances in High Energy Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in High Energy Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in High Energy Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in High Energy Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025