Florian Staub

7.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
83 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

Florian Staub is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Florian Staub has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 82 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 23 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Florian Staub's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (80 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (35 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (31 papers). Florian Staub is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (80 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (35 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (31 papers). Florian Staub collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and France. Florian Staub's co-authors include W. Porod, Mark D. Goodsell, Avelino Vicente, Kai Schmidt-Hoberg, Kilian Nickel, Ben O’Leary, José Eliel Camargo-Molina, Michal Malinský, D. Aristizábal Sierra and Martin Wolfgang Winkler and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Computer Physics Communications.

In The Last Decade

Florian Staub

83 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Hit Papers

SARAH   4: A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders 2012 2026 2016 2021 2014 2012 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Florian Staub Germany 30 3.7k 1.3k 207 62 50 83 3.8k
Neil D. Christensen United States 19 3.6k 1.0× 1.2k 0.9× 164 0.8× 75 1.2× 74 1.5× 38 3.7k
W. Porod Germany 31 3.6k 1.0× 913 0.7× 120 0.6× 33 0.5× 23 0.5× 135 3.7k
Andrea Wulzer Italy 28 2.2k 0.6× 646 0.5× 222 1.1× 55 0.9× 22 0.4× 49 2.3k
Céline Degrande Belgium 18 3.4k 0.9× 863 0.7× 154 0.7× 42 0.7× 69 1.4× 32 3.5k
W. Hollik Germany 33 4.2k 1.1× 1.1k 0.9× 166 0.8× 52 0.8× 52 1.0× 115 4.2k
L. Lavoura Portugal 27 4.2k 1.1× 805 0.6× 128 0.6× 52 0.8× 19 0.4× 98 4.3k
Dominik Stöckinger Germany 27 2.3k 0.6× 641 0.5× 204 1.0× 126 2.0× 26 0.5× 76 2.4k
B. C. Allanach United Kingdom 28 2.5k 0.7× 881 0.7× 153 0.7× 45 0.7× 16 0.3× 109 2.6k
Nishita Desai India 13 2.8k 0.8× 578 0.5× 222 1.1× 26 0.4× 65 1.3× 21 2.9k
Robert V. Harlander Germany 29 3.6k 1.0× 481 0.4× 99 0.5× 38 0.6× 46 0.9× 86 3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Florian Staub

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Florian Staub's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Florian Staub with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Florian Staub more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Florian Staub

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Florian Staub. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Florian Staub. The network helps show where Florian Staub may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Florian Staub

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Florian Staub. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Florian Staub based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Florian Staub. Florian Staub is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Porod, W., et al.. (2020). Collider phenomenology of a unified leptoquark model. Physical review. D. 101(9). 18 indexed citations
2.
Staub, Florian, et al.. (2018). Perturbativity constraints in BSM models. Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology). 17 indexed citations
3.
Staub, Florian, et al.. (2018). Unitarity constraints in triplet extensions beyond the large s limit. Physical review. D. 98(1). 12 indexed citations
4.
Braathen, Johannes, et al.. (2017). Match before you run: N is better than N-1. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
5.
Braathen, Johannes, Mark D. Goodsell, & Florian Staub. (2017). Supersymmetric and non-supersymmetric models without catastrophic Goldstone bosons. The European Physical Journal C. 77(11). 757–757. 41 indexed citations
6.
Goodsell, Mark D., Stefan Liebler, & Florian Staub. (2017). Generic calculation of two-body partial decay widths at the full one-loop level. The European Physical Journal C. 77(11). 758–758. 34 indexed citations
7.
Camargo-Molina, José Eliel, Ben O’Leary, W. Porod, & Florian Staub. (2016). Vevacious: a tool for finding the global minima of one-loop effective potentials with many scalars. Online Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University). 45 indexed citations
8.
Dreiner, Herbi K., et al.. (2016). Validity of the CMSSM interpretation of the diphoton excess. Physical review. D. 94(5). 5 indexed citations
9.
Ding, Ran, Tianjun Li, Florian Staub, & Bin Zhu. (2016). Supersoft supersymmetry, conformal sequestering, and single scale supersymmetry breaking. Physical review. D. 93(9). 12 indexed citations
10.
Goodsell, Mark D., Kilian Nickel, & Florian Staub. (2016). The Higgs mass in the MSSM at two-loop order beyond minimal flavour violation. Physics Letters B. 758. 18–25. 6 indexed citations
11.
Goodsell, Mark D., Kilian Nickel, & Florian Staub. (2015). Two-loop Higgs mass calculations in supersymmetric models beyond the MSSM with SARAH and SPheno. The European Physical Journal C. 75(1). 65 indexed citations
12.
Goodsell, Mark D., et al.. (2015). Dark matter scenarios in a UV-complete model with Dirac gauginos. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations
13.
Goodsell, Mark D., Kilian Nickel, & Florian Staub. (2015). Generic two-loop Higgs mass calculation from a diagrammatic approach. The European Physical Journal C. 75(6). 47 indexed citations
14.
Goodsell, Mark D., et al.. (2014). Constrained minimal Dirac gaugino supersymmetric standard model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(4). 27 indexed citations
15.
Basso, L. & Florian Staub. (2013). Enhancinghγγwith staus in supersymmetric models with an extended gauge sector. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 87(1). 26 indexed citations
16.
Dreiner, Herbert K., Kilian Nickel, W. Porod, & Florian Staub. (2012). Precise predictions for BR$(B_{s,d}^0\to \ell \bar \ell)$ in models beyond the MSSM with {\tt SARAH} and {\tt SPheno}. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
17.
Hirsch, M., Florian Staub, & Avelino Vicente. (2012). Enhancingli3ljwith theZ0-penguin. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(11). 18 indexed citations
18.
Staub, Florian. (2012). Linking SARAH and MadGraph using the UFO format. arXiv (Cornell University). 3 indexed citations
19.
Romão, Jorge C., et al.. (2012). Dark matter and LHC phenomenology in a left-right supersymmetric model. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2012(1). 13 indexed citations
20.
Basso, L., Ben O’Leary, W. Porod, & Florian Staub. (2012). Dark matter scenarios in the minimal SUSY B − L model. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2012(9). 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026