Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures
Impact in
- Authors
- John H. FlavellLee Ross
- Journal
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9894490 →Countries where authors are citing Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures
This map shows the geographic impact of Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures
This network shows the impact of Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures.
About Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures
This paper, published in 1981, received 565 indexed citations . Written by John H. Flavell and Lee Ross. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (190 citations), Social Psychology (179 citations), Education (178 citations), Clinical Psychology (133 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (100 citations). Published in Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9894490.